[olug] verbose logging removed from BIND - Why?

Dave Thacker dthacker9 at cox.net
Thu Feb 14 13:22:33 UTC 2008

On Wednesday 13 February 2008 13:19:02 OBrien, TG wrote:
> Anyone have insight as to why BIND removed the more verbose logging from
> later versions, that was included in previous versions?
> (shakes head)

(places tongue firmly in cheek)
-Hard drives are *so* expensive
-Reading log files causes eyestrain
-Why would you care who is poisoning your cache?
-logrotate is *hard*

and the most likely ( and incorrect) reason.....

Nobody ever reads this %$*! anyway!


More information about the OLUG mailing list