[olug] SSH on an NT 4 box with Nutcracker

[Thom Harrison]

The encryption would probably slow things down but using the compression 
option may compensate.

------------------

I just ran some tests transferring a 44MB file.  The following numbers 
are in MB/s

ftp   sftp
38.0   9.0
54.9   9.9
57.6   9.8
57.2  10.6
57.3  10.5






OBrien, Timothy (Omaha Linux Users Group - OLUG) wrote:

><quote who="Thom Harrison">
>  
>
>>Can the NT box be physically moved into close proximity of the Sun
>>boxes?  If so, I might turn out to be quicker to simply through a
>>crossover cable between the two and transfer the data any way you want (
>>ftp, sftp, scp etc... )
>>
>>I believe that the ftp transfer would be quicker than sftp.
>>
>>Just my nickel's worth.
>>
>>Thom
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, two replies to the same email... must be on directly to me & one to
>the list...
>
>Anyway, yes this could be a solution. But the vendor is located in Chicago
>and will not be coming on site - they will transfer the database to them,
>do some fixing, & then transfer the database to the new Sun box.
>
>Why would SSH file transfer be slower than FTP?
>
>--
>Timothy "Irish" O'Brien
>Publicity & Social activities chairperson
>Omaha Linux User's Group (OLUG)
>----------------------------------------------
>A: No.
>Q: Should I include e-mail quotations after my reply?
>=====================================================
>An often repeated quote on news.admin.net-abuse.email:
><I>
>"Spam is not about content, it is about consent".
></i>
>--------------------------------
>Microsoft: Where do you want to go today?
>Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
>FreeBSD: Are you guys coming or what?
>
>  
>