[olug] FreeBSD 5.1 - How stable is "less stable"

[neal rauhauser]

   If you want ultra stable you want 4.9, not 5.1

   I haven't had much trouble with my stock RH9.0 install on this 
laptop, but I'm not pushing it like I push FreeBSD boxes. I have a 
number of 4.9 boxes doing DNS, qmail, ssh, and various network 
management stuff and I've never been happier - they're not down unless I 
*take* them down for some reason.



John Williams wrote:
> I have been using linux for some time now and was wanting to try FreeBSD.  I
> see a stable version and a less stable version.  I am curious how the
> stability of 5.1 would compare to RH 9.0.  Thanks.
> 
> John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> 
> 


-- 
mailto:neal at lists.rauhauser.net
phone:402-301-9555
IM:Neal R Rauhauser
"After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters,
you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic