[olug] qmail or sendmail - behind Cox of course...

[Mike Hostetler]

On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 00:03, Adam Haeder wrote:
> OK, since Phil is so boisterously beating on non-Exim MTAs.... :-)
> I like sendmail. It's not that difficult to configure, there is mucho
> documentation, and lots of fun plugins. I've used it for years on many
> different system configs.

You are really only saying that because you haven't set up anything else
but sendmail =).

I'm using Postfix and it's wonderful -- the install is easy, and the
configuration is even easier.  The config files make sense (which is
more than I can say for sendmail.cf) and it's waaay more secure than
sendmail.  And it's a lot faster (on my machine anyway).

Postfix, in goal and usage, is about the same as Qmail.  Both of them
are quality.  I use Postfix because that's what I downloaded first! 


-- 
Mike Hostetler          
thehaas at binary.net 
http://www.binary.net/thehaas 
GnuPG key: http://www.binary.net/thehaas/mikeh.gpg 

"What good is having someone who can walk on water if you don't follow
in his footsteps?"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.olug.org/pipermail/olug/attachments/20020320/e25e414b/attachment.pgp>