[olug-colo] IRC policy

[Dan Clough]

Well, luckily we'll have a Network Admin whose head is not firmly
planted in a place it shouldn't be ;)

The minimum intervention policy is also a good idea.  We should also
enact a policy stating that we reserve the right to throttle servers
we deem to be overutilizing the shared bandwidth pool.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 08:36:58 pm Phil Brutsche wrote:
>> No piracy of media (music, movies) or software
>
> When speaking in legalese, I do know this must be called "copyright
> infringement". ;)
>
>> Make it clear that we will cooperate with law enforcement
>>
>> Make it clear that we will have no qualms about disconnecting
>> misbehaving "clients"
>
> However, I think also important is that we don't go snooping/investigating on
> our own, and require law enforcement to follow proper procedures (subpoenas,
> etc).
>
> The datacenter I deal with in Connecticut pulled the plug on my server when I
> got attacked by a (non-distributed) DoS. This annoyed me a great deal, and I
> think it would be a good idea to adopt a "minimum intervention" policy for
> such circumstances (the correct solution to the DoS problem, implemented by
> the datacenter when I proposed it, was to null route the one IP being
> targetted and allow the other IPs to go on working)
>
> _______________________________________________
> olug-colo mailing list
> olug-colo at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>