[olug-colo] [olug] Community Colo Project

[Charles.Bird]

might have to sand them down and repaint :)



On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Charles.Bird <charles.bird at powerdnn.com>wrote:

> I can get 2 posts
>
> I'll verify that.
>
> Joe G, you out there watching? Does Steve still have some in the barn
> covered in mouse piss?
>
>
>
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan Clough <dclough at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently we're planning on putting up a few servers, one to serve as a
>> general webhosting server for people who just need websites, and one or two
>> VPS nodes for those who need root access but don't have or can't afford a
>> dedicated machine.  Having you on board to help handle the VPS side of
>> things would be wonderful, we need all the help we can get.
>>
>> It sounds like we're good on cabinets at the moment, thanks for
>> volunteering yours though.
>>
>> I got to thinking, and depending on the size of the cage a two-post might
>> be necessary for the router and switches if we're going to have more than a
>> few U worth of them.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Luke-Jr" <luke at dashjr.org>
>>
>> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:17:48
>> To: Olug Community colo project<olug-colo at olug.org>
>> Subject: Re: [olug-colo] [olug] Community Colo Project
>>
>>
>> Resending here, for the archives and anyone who might have missed it on
>> the
>> main OLUG thread...
>>
>> ----
>>
>> I have a full height server rack that could be used. Also a PowerEdge 6400
>> (2x
>> 512 MHz) that I use for family email, website, etc. It's setup for OpenVZ,
>> though I haven't actually used it on that machine yet.
>>
>> I currently have my own just-me game and VPS hosting company using dedis
>> in
>> Texas, Connecticut, and London. Is the scope of this project merely
>> colocation, or maybe we should offer VPS hosting as well? ;)
>>
>> As far as bandwidth management, something to consider might be agreeing to
>> set
>> reasonable QoS flags, and having a router that honours them. So any bulk
>> transfer would get flagged as low-priority while VoIP type stuff could be
>> flagged as minimize-latency.
>>
>> Luke
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> olug-colo mailing list
>> olug-colo at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>> _______________________________________________
>> olug-colo mailing list
>> olug-colo at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The information transmitted in this e-mail message and attachments, if
> any, may be of a confidential matter, and is intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity named above. Distribution to, or review
> by, unauthorized persons is prohibited. All personal messages express
> views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to
> MobileNow, Inc.. If you have received this transmission in error,
> immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this transmission
> including attachments, if any.
>



-- 
The information transmitted in this e-mail message and attachments, if
any, may be of a confidential matter, and is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity named above. Distribution to, or review
by, unauthorized persons is prohibited. All personal messages express
views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to
MobileNow, Inc.. If you have received this transmission in error,
immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this transmission
including attachments, if any.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.olug.org/pipermail/olug-colo/attachments/20090403/beb007fb/attachment.htm